Output 7
Students' Research Teams
Research-based learning is a learning model that can develop the rhetorical skills: critical thinking, inquiry, teamwork, empathy. Developing such learning model is also in accordance with the recommendations of our universities.
Explore the results of Students' Research Teams output.
Project's description and recommendations in one report
Student Research Teams aimed at networking among students from partner countries by establishing research-based learning and peer-learning activities. The report includes a summary of this RHEFINE’s sub-project with workshop outlines and general recommendations.
The report is available in English, Polish, Croatian, and Bulgarian.
2. Phase: April-October 2022
https://flic.kr/p/5WvXTj
5 essays in the handbook!
We are pleased to inform that the editor of Methods of Rhetorical Criticism chose 4 essays to the handbook. Congratulations to:
Dagmara Mateja, Pentadic analysis of Zelensky’s speech "We'll Defend Ourselves, You'll See Our Faces, Not Backs"
Marcela Grgec, Pentadic analysis of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Address to Russians
Hrvoje Novak, Pentadička analiza političkoga govora Volodimira Zelenskog
Klaudia Bulić, Pentadic analysis of Andrzej Duda speech
You may find the book here.
Academic Days of Rhetoric / Erasmus Days 2022 - presentations & dissemination
From speech analysis to speech making
Why it is worth collaborating in an international student environment?
Time for evaluation
We are delighted that the first venture of its kind to bring together students from different faculties and levels of study from Poland and Croatia was met with positive feedback.
Students appreciated the methods of rhetorical analysis presented and the variety of material that provided an extension to their existing knowledge and skills.
They appreciated both the group work within their classes and in international groups.
They indicated that an obstacle, apart from the language barrier (for some this was the first such opportunity to speak publicly in a foreign language), was the most difficult to establish effective ways of group communication.
Interestingly, most preferred written communication to online meetings. This may also have been due to the indicated problems in agreeing common convenient meeting dates.
What participants emphasised, however, was that the project not only gave them new competences, but was an opportunity to meet new people, exchange their perspectives, including seeing differences and similarities in approaches to rhetorical analysis.
You can see the detailed evaluation's answers here.
Here are some opinions:
What was your personal benefit of the work in international groups?
Using english but also developing skills of comunication and about rethorics.
It was interesting to hear others' opinion and their perspective.
I leaded everything and saw how it is to work internationality.
I got to see how my colleagues from Poland are working with rethoric material and to compare our work with work in other countries
What would suggest to repeat when organizing student's international collaboration again?
The internationals groups with team leaders are great!
The atmosphere where one feels free to share opinions and is not afraid to ask questions.
Blending the groups to make an international one. Working in such teams is very valuable.
O7 Workshop # 3
Students' Research Teams - last workshop
After two months of international collaboration, it was time for the final workshop - this time the teams, together with their new leaders, prepared an analysis of the Ukrainian president's speech delivered shortly before the outbreak of war. The analytical framework was pentadic criticism, to which Aleksandra Lukowska, a PhD student from the University of Warsaw, had given an introduction at the last workshop.
We discussed 5 interesting analyses for which the students used an approach that was new to them.
At the end of the project, we talked some more about the advantages and disadvantages of working in an international team, as well as the very dynamics of working in a group, where everyone can take on a slightly different role.
At the end of the meeting, instructions were given on how to write an essay that could become part of a planned handbook on rhetorical criticism (O1).
Students were also asked to take part in an anonymous survey to summarise the project.
O7 Workshop # 2
Students' Research Teams - second workshop (O7)
During the second virtual workshop in Output 7, students took the floor. We could see the effect of their work. And the task was not easy. As a continuation of the analysis of Arnold Schwarzenegger's speech, students in international groups prepared its analysis according to the rules proposed by the instructors.
Then we moved on to analyze two political speeches by president Duda and president Milanović, moderated by Vlatka from Croatia and Witold from Poland. Prior to the workshop they suggested dividing into groups and prepared the tasks to be performed.
Polish teams analyzed the speech of the Croatian president and Croatians analyzed the speech of the Polish president. Thanks to this we could compare our observations of the speeches of public figures who hold the same function but about whom we have different situational knowledge and for whom we have different expectations.
Finally, Aleksandra Łukowska introduced the basics of pentadic criticism, which will be used by international teams to analyze Zelensky's speech to Russians. The next workshop, already the last one, will be held in June.
O7 Workshop # 1
Students' Research Teams - new opening (O7)
With the new academic year, we began the second installment of output 7 involving collaboration between student groups. This time we took advantage of the fact that at the University of Warsaw in the summer semester there are classes on the art of presentation, and at the University of Zagreb there is a course on rhetorical genres.
This time we proposed 3 joint online workshops in which we look at the rhetorical analysis of political speeches together with students. Arnold Schwarzenegger's speech delivered as a response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine was chosen for the first meeting on April 29.
The next workshop will be partially student-led in May. The workshop will include speeches by Polish and Croatian politicians. The series of workshops will conclude with an analysis of the speech made by the President of Ukraine just before the start of the war.
The workshops are prepared by Ewa Modrzejewska, Aleksandra Łukowska and Elenmari Pletikos Olof.
Network of Researchers in Rhetoric - A Guide
Milestones:
29th April: workshop #1: We propose the plan (topic: A message to the Russian people by Arnold Schwarzenegger)
13th May: workshop #2: You propose the plan (topic: PL/CRO political speech)
3rd June: workshop #3: We + You (topic: Zelensky’s speech to Russians, Feb. 2022)
July: essays for the Methods of Rhetorical Criticism Handbook
October: Erasmus Days, presentations of the results
Please, find the instructions here.
1. Phase: May -October 2021
2021 Erasmus Days - presentations
Our online event, which was part of Erasmus Days, was a great opportunity to present the first outcomes of the output. From voice training to antivaxxers' rhetoric, from athletes on Facebook to the Croatian president on social media, and from different formats of debate to jokes told by Google Assistant - the topics investigated by 6 international teams of young researchers were thought-provoking.
Voice training video
Presentation by
Tea Špoljar
Daria Granić
Mateo Miličević
Christian Coltrane
Institutions cooperating:
University of Zagreb
Institute of Rhetoric and Communication
Different formats, the same subject
Presentation by
Kinga Rogowska
Aleksandra Łukowska
Natalia Borzuta
Christian Coltrane
Institutions cooperating:
University of Warsaw
University of Zagreb
Athletes during the COVID pandemic
Presentation by
Weronika Pisula
Karolina Kulpa
Institutions cooperating:
University of Warsaw
University of Zagreb
Internet of things
Rhetoric and Digitalization
Presentation by
Dobryan Boev
Institutions cooperating:
Institute of Rhetoric and Communication
University of Zagreb
Internet of things
Rhetoric and Digitalization
Presentation by
Jagoda Poropat Darrer
Institutions cooperating:
Institute of Rhetoric and Communication
University of Zagreb
Internet of things
Rhetoric and Digitalization
Poster by
Vesela Georgieva
Institutions cooperating:
University of Zagreb
Institute of Rhetoric and Communication
COVID and the Internet
Poster by
Kalina Passkaleva
Institutions cooperating:
University of Warsaw
University of Zagreb
Institute of Rhetoric and Communication
COVID and the Internet
Presentation by
Ana Vlah
Christian Coltrane
Nika Pulig
Institutions cooperating:
University of Warsaw
University of Zagreb
Institute of Rhetoric and Communication
Dissemination: Output presentations during the XXV Science Festival in Warsaw
"Debating" team in action
The XXV Science Festival has been an opportunity for O7 team working on debating formats to show the practical site of their work.
The outcomes of the workshop "Dyskusja od podstaw - warsztaty z debatowania" will also be elaborated in form of a chapter as part of O3 "The Rhetoric of Debate". Also other ideas of the Students' Research Teams (O7) were briefly presented during the event. The final presentations are planned for Erasmus Days in October.
Project's workshop
During the pilot workshop, the coordinator of this output, dr Ewa Modrzejewska, welcomed the international team and presented the goals of this project. Students who proposed the research topics had some time to present them and invite other students to join their research groups.
We have formed 6 international student research groups that will be working on topics from fake news and social media rhetoric, through voice training methods to debate formats and tools. We will be seeing their research results in a couple of months!
Network of Researchers in Rhetoric - A Guide
Milestones:
19 May 2021: pilot workshop for students, selecting groups and topics;
31 May 2021: final deadlines for the final research proposals;
June: online meeting within the topic’s groups (presentation of the detailed topic and the expected results/effects);
June-October: work on the topic under the supervision of the scientific advisors;
September: online meeting within the topic’s groups (presentation of the detailed topic and the expected results/effects);
October: Autumn Student School (3rd week, between 18-22 Oct, 2021): final presentation of the results, series of workshops and meetings (online/offline).
Please, find the instructions here.